The financial industry is on the verge of a major shift as institutional players like BlackRock and Deutsche Bank embrace bitcoin and seek to develop financial products related to the cryptocurrency. While these firms may be interested in holding bitcoin on their balance sheets, the true motivation behind their involvement is to create access to bitcoin for their customers through financial products. This article explores the reasons why financial institutions are unlikely to buy bitcoin directly, including the complexity of managing wallets, concerns about security, the impact on assets under management, and the potential for fee generation. Moreover, with the upcoming halving of bitcoin supply, demand is expected to surge, further driving the need for bitcoin-related financial products. The emergence of these institutional players in the bitcoin space is seen as a validation of the cryptocurrency and a significant victory for digital wealth.
Financial Institutions Embrace Bitcoin with New Products
The growing acceptance and adoption of Bitcoin by financial institutions is changing the landscape of the industry. As the market for digital assets continues to expand, these institutions are increasingly exploring opportunities to offer Bitcoin-related products to their customers. However, despite this trend, many financial firms are hesitant to buy Bitcoin for their balance sheets. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this hesitation and how the upcoming halving event may impact the situation.
Why Financial Firms Won’t Buy Bitcoin For Their Balance Sheets
Customers Lack Knowledge and Infrastructure
One of the main reasons why financial firms are reluctant to buy Bitcoin for their balance sheets is the lack of knowledge and infrastructure among their customers. This applies not only to retail customers but also to sophisticated money managers and institutions. Opening and managing Bitcoin wallets can be a complex and unforgiving process, and providing direct Bitcoin purchases at scale would require significant infrastructure and education. Additionally, financial institutions would also have to compete with established companies like Coinbase, which dominate the market.
Security Concerns
Another factor that prevents financial firms from investing directly in Bitcoin is the security risks associated with holding the asset securely. Managing direct Bitcoin holdings for thousands or millions of customers can make these institutions lucrative targets for hackers, criminals, or internal bad actors. To address these concerns, many consultancies have emerged to assist financial institutions in developing highly-secure cold storage processes and procedures. However, no system is completely immune to infiltration, as seen in famous bank heist movies.
AUM and Asset Management
Financial firms consider the assets under management (AUM) as a critical metric for their success. Directly buying Bitcoin for their customers would result in a loss of AUM, as the asset would no longer be managed by the institution. This is a key reason why financial firms prefer to create financial products that allow them to remain in management control while still providing exposure to Bitcoin.
Fee Structure and Revenue
Financial products related to Bitcoin offer convenience and enable institutions to generate revenue. While the next wave of Bitcoin investors may not be actively trading, they will be buying and holding Bitcoin as part of a larger portfolio. This means that the institutions can charge a percentage fee of AUM, ensuring a steady stream of revenue as long as the Bitcoin holdings remain in the account.
Anticipated Rise in Demand
Financial firms are also cautious about directly buying Bitcoin because the upcoming halving event is expected to increase demand and possibly drive up the price. The halving event, which cuts the block reward in half, reduces the supply of Bitcoin. Based on past halvings, this scarcity has typically resulted in a surge in price. Financial firms are wary of buying Bitcoin at its current price, as they expect the price to rise significantly after the halving, leading to an increased demand for the asset.
Customers Lack Knowledge and Infrastructure
To effectively offer Bitcoin to their customers, financial firms need to address the lack of knowledge and infrastructure among their clients. This is not limited to retail customers but also extends to money managers and institutions. The complexity of Bitcoin wallets and the overall management process make it challenging for customers to navigate the world of Bitcoin. Financial institutions would need to invest in infrastructure and education to ensure their customers are comfortable and well-informed about Bitcoin. Additionally, they would also have to compete with existing companies like Coinbase, which have already established a dominant position in the market.
Do You Love Learning Crypto? Then Read More Here!
Security Concerns
Managing secure storage of Bitcoin presents a significant challenge for financial institutions. Holding large amounts of Bitcoin securely can make institutions attractive targets for hackers and internal threats. Protecting digital assets from potential infiltrations requires robust security measures and constant vigilance. To mitigate these security concerns, financial firms are seeking help from consultancies specializing in improving security protocols. However, there is no foolproof system, and institutions must remain vigilant to prevent any breaches.
AUM and Asset Management
Assets under management (AUM) play a crucial role in determining the success of financial firms. Directly buying Bitcoin for customers would result in a reduction of AUM, as the asset would no longer be under the institution’s management. This loss of AUM can have implications for the institution’s reputation and overall standing in the market. Therefore, financial firms prefer to create financial products that allow them to retain management control while still providing exposure to Bitcoin.
Fee Structure and Revenue
Financial products related to Bitcoin offer convenience to investors and generate revenue for the institutions. While the next wave of Bitcoin investors may not be actively trading, they will be buying and holding Bitcoin alongside their larger portfolios. This means that financial institutions can charge a percentage fee of AUM, ensuring a steady revenue stream as long as the Bitcoin holdings remain in the account. This fee structure ensures that financial institutions can generate income even if Bitcoin prices remain relatively stable.
Anticipated Rise in Demand
Financial firms are cautious about directly buying Bitcoin for their balance sheets because of the anticipated rise in demand after the upcoming halving event. The halving event reduces the supply of new Bitcoin, which has historically resulted in price surges. Financial firms expect the demand for Bitcoin to increase significantly after the halving, potentially driving up the price. As a result, financial institutions are waiting for a more opportune time to enter the market and avoid buying Bitcoin at its current price.
How The Next Halving Changes Things
The upcoming halving event will have a significant impact on the Bitcoin market and how financial institutions approach it. This event, which occurs approximately every four years, reduces the block reward and increases the scarcity of Bitcoin. As a result, investors and institutions will face lower liquidity and increased competition for access to Bitcoin. In response to this situation, they will likely explore alternative investment options, such as investing in privately-held and publicly-listed Bitcoin miners or using Bitcoin financial vehicles.
Previous Halvings as Economic Opportunities
The previous halving events in Bitcoin’s history have presented unique economic opportunities. After the first halving, the price of Bitcoin experienced a significant increase within twelve months, reaching over 9,000%. Similar surges in price were observed following the second and third halvings as well. These events highlight the potential for significant price appreciation after the halving. However, without easy and low-friction avenues to access Bitcoin, the price did not fully reflect its increasing scarcity. With the rise of Bitcoin financial products, it is expected that access to Bitcoin will become easier, allowing the price to better reflect its scarcity and potential.
Accessing Bitcoin through Financial Products
To overcome the barriers to direct Bitcoin investment, financial firms are exploring the option of offering Bitcoin financial products to their customers. The approval of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is being sought by various players in the financial industry, including BlackRock. These financial products provide an easier and low-friction avenue for customers to gain exposure to Bitcoin. By offering Bitcoin financial products, financial firms can cater to a wider range of customers while still benefiting from the growing interest in Bitcoin.
In conclusion, although financial institutions are embracing Bitcoin by offering various financial products, many are hesitant to buy Bitcoin for their balance sheets. This hesitancy is driven by factors such as lack of customer knowledge and infrastructure, security concerns, AUM considerations, fee structure preferences, and the anticipated rise in demand after the halving. As the industry evolves and the market for Bitcoin matures, financial firms will likely continue to develop new ways for their customers to access Bitcoin while minimizing the associated risks.
Making Money WIth Crypto Requires Knowledge; learn More Here!
